Diagnosing web site architecture issues
Amplify Interactive’s notes from SMX Advanced Seattle 2008
Second day of SMX Advanced, Developer Track
Vanessa Fox, Search Engine Land:
Vans.com has problems with javascript code. They don’t come up high in search due to this. She uses this as an example of identifying problems with websites to determine your strategy.
Chris Silver Smith, Netconcepts:
blog: naturalsearchblog.com
For the newbies:
- Do a sitecommand and see how many results your site has.
- Yahoo shows many more than Google. This is somewhat due to Yahoo! showing duplicate content.
- Do a “inurl:sessionid” search to see if you might have duplicte content.
Register with Webmaster tools and look for errors
New area in Webmaster tools on title tags, meta, content, etc.
- New area in Webmaster tools on title tags, meta, content, etc.
- Check your robots.txt file
Coca-Cola has a homepage redirect (bad redirect).
He uses web-sniffer.net to see what is returned by the server.
Coca-Cola shows a 200 redirect code which is bad. It should be a 301.
Google handles these issues “pretty fluidly” now, but not the other search engines.
Use Lynx Browser to look at links on a page.
Use the Firefox Developer extension and the Link Counter extension.
Another utility: Acxiom’s MarketLeap Benchmarking Link Popularity
SEOMoz’s SEO Toolbox. They have many good utilities all in one in place.
- example: who else is hosted on my IP
- your ISP could host several domain names on the same IP address which could hurt your site.
Look at “Google Sets” to ID your top competitors, and then see why they are ranking well.
Special Whitepapers available at chris@netconcepts.com
Jonathan Hochman, Hochmanconsultants.com
Diagnosing and Fixing Websites:
Favorite tools:
- NoScript (firefox add-on), blocks all client side scripts
- More sophisticated users might have javascript disabled. There are not many of these users, but could be influential.
Flash issues: make html content as well
Check Google’s cache to see what they actually got out of your page
Live HTTP headers (exposes redirects)
Gillete.com (after redirects which were 302ed) has an OK cache
SWFobject() 2.0 to help with flash sites
For java/ajax, modify DOM to replace HTML content, or use <noscript> tags
For Silverlight, create your own SEO-friendly insertion code.
SWFobject is not cloaking. It is open-souce Google development now.
it is not considered cloaking.
There is an article in Searchengine Land about it
Text must be identical to text in flash, but you can not describe the flash.
Xenu’s Link Sleuth: Contains some anti-Scientionlogy information due to 90s controversy.
It is a handy spider to look at sites
Firefox Web Developer:
You can view code problems
Watch out for search problems with frames, iframes, Flash and Silverlight.
Each object is treated as a separate item, not as part of the host page.
Watch out for AJAx due to iframe issues
David Golightly, Zillow:
Optimizing Zillow’s Search Interface for Engines: A Case Study.
David is not an SEO, and discusses the issues Zillow had including issues using Ajax and Javascipt.















Hi Julian,
Thanks for sharing the above informations with us. I feel its a great new for me too
* Do a sitecommand “site:url.com” and see how many results your site has.
* [use yahoo instead of Google] Yahoo shows many more [results] than Google.
* Do a “inurl:sessionid” search to see if you might have duplicate content.
Firefox addons for SEO has made lot more change in conventional techniques, SEOquake and searchstatus are widely used addosn which does not require this much sense of knowledge to understand all these stuffs.
The first answer was kind of correct but was slightly off base. Insects don’t fly toward the Moon, simply because that would typically be useless. But no matter what angle they set in their navigation (which results in a straight line for a distant object like the moon), using a fixed angle with a nearby light source results in a flight path that is not straight but is instead a Fibonacci spiral.
I have no idea what you’re talking about or why you’re talking about it here – but I had to publish your comment just because it was so off the wall. Thanks for keeping it interesting Daryl.