Comments on: Google Can Index Flash, But it Still Sucks for SEO http://www.amplify-interactive.com/blog/seo/google-can-index-flash-but-it-still-sucks-for-seo/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=google-can-index-flash-but-it-still-sucks-for-seo A Portland, Oregon Search Engine Marketing Firm. Thu, 17 May 2012 19:17:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Thomas Rowe http://www.amplify-interactive.com/blog/seo/google-can-index-flash-but-it-still-sucks-for-seo/#comment-2538 Thomas Rowe Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:44:02 +0000 /2008/09/30/google-can-index-flash-but-it-still-sucks-for-seo/#comment-2538 Yes, you are right, flash really sucks for SEO. Yes, you are right, flash really sucks for SEO.

]]> By: Traffic Formula for MLM http://www.amplify-interactive.com/blog/seo/google-can-index-flash-but-it-still-sucks-for-seo/#comment-2537 Traffic Formula for MLM Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:26:15 +0000 /2008/09/30/google-can-index-flash-but-it-still-sucks-for-seo/#comment-2537 You're right: Flash should only be a part of the page while the page should still have basic on-page HTML elements (metdaD, metaK, visible body text, etc) to make it SEO-friendly. Regards, You’re right: Flash should only be a part of the page while the page should still have basic on-page HTML elements (metdaD, metaK, visible body text, etc) to make it SEO-friendly. Regards,

]]> By: Adam http://www.amplify-interactive.com/blog/seo/google-can-index-flash-but-it-still-sucks-for-seo/#comment-2536 Adam Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:20:14 +0000 /2008/09/30/google-can-index-flash-but-it-still-sucks-for-seo/#comment-2536 "Have you ever tried to send someone a link from a page within an all Flash site..." No doubt! Instead of a real URL, it turns into "click this, then this, then this..." “Have you ever tried to send someone a link from a page within an all Flash site…”

No doubt! Instead of a real URL, it turns into “click this, then this, then this…”

]]>